Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A Social Digital Identity Model of Misogyny

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Bingley, William J.
Lee, Georgina C.
Meger, Sara
Cruwys, Tegan
Haslam, S. Alexander
Reynolds, Katherine J.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Misogyny appears to be increasing among some men and boys. In the present paper we conceptualize this pressing societal issue as a form of intergroup prejudice that is shaped by both emerging technologies and social identity processes. Specifically, we outline a social digital identity model of misogyny in which engagement with polarizing, gendered online technologies can lead men and boys to see both themselves and the world in terms of an intergroup conflict between genders, in turn leading to negative attitudes towards women and girls. We tested this theoretical model in two correlational studies of men (Nmen = 1398, ages 18–88) and boys (Nboys = 661, ages 13–17). Supporting the model, we found that engagement with online technologies predicted higher misogyny, and this relationship was mediated via greater perceptions of intergroup gender conflict. However, contrary to predictions, masculine social identification did not mediate this relationship, indicating that it is the content rather than the degree of masculine social identity that is particularly problematic in the context of misogyny. Online activities that were specifically gendered (e.g., engagement with ‘manfluencers’) were the most strongly related to misogyny. Indeed, when controlling for more gendered online engagement, social media use was not related to misogyny in men and predicted lower misogyny in boys. Moreover, the relationship between technology engagement and higher misogyny was stronger for boys than men. Practical implications are discussed.

Description

Citation

Source

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until