Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

DISCORD: Enhancing knowledge distillation via cross-chain of thought and optimal transport alignment between models with different tokenizers

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Hai, Nam Le
Le, Anh Duc
Vu, Tu
Van, Linh Ngo

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve state-of-the-art performance across various NLP tasks but face deployment challenges due to high computational costs and memory constraints. Knowledge distillation (KD) is a promising solution, transferring knowledge from large teacher models to smaller student models. However, existing KD methods often assume shared vocabularies and tokenizers, limiting their flexibility. While approaches like MultiLevelOT, Universal Logit Distillation (ULD) and Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation (DSKD) address vocabulary mismatches, they overlook the critical reasoning-aware distillation aspect. To bridge this gap, we propose DISCORD, a universal KD framework that integrates Chain-of-Thought (CoT) augmentation and introduces Cross-CoT Alignment to enhance reasoning transfer. Additionally, we extend Optimal Transport beyond token-wise alignment to a sequence-level and layer-wise alignment approach that adapts to varying sequence lengths while preserving contextual integrity. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that DISCORD outperforms existing KD methods across different vocabulary settings, improving reasoning capabilities and robustness in both domain-specific and cross-task scenarios.

Description

Citation

Source

Knowledge-Based Systems

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until