Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A review of methods for assessing progress towards Closing the Gap: Final Report

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Cooms, Valerie
Markham, Francis
Harrap, Benjamin
Bray, Rob
Su, Wen
Shiosaki, Elfie
Dinku, Yonatan
Howard-Wagner, Deirdre
Biddle, Nicholas
Somboonsin, Pattheera

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Canberra, ACT: Australian National University, POLIS Centre for Indigenous Policy Research

Access Statement

Open Access

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This report describes a review of the methods used by the Productivity Commission to assess progress towards targets under the National Agreement on Closing the Gap. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the current methodology used to track progress towards national targets, develop a framework for assessing the contributions of states and territories, and test the revised method and proposed approach using existing data. A significant finding of the report concerns the shortcomings in data used for assessing progress. These limitations relate to both the efficacy of the data for monitoring progress, as well as the cultural suitability of the data. The study highlights issues such as substantial data gaps, infrequent data collection and delayed reporting, which lead to outdated information being published, hampering effective monitoring and undermining accountability. Moreover, inconsistencies in data sources lead to substantial revisions in observed data, affecting the reliability of progress assessments. In addition to these key findings, the report suggests various improvements to the methodology of assessing progress, particularly regarding the confidence in these assessments. While these are important, they are considered secondary to the issues with data identified. Lastly, the report presents four options for assessing the adequacy of state and territory contributions to meeting national targets. We recommend a specific method which we believe is both most effective and most closely aligned with the principles of the National Agreement on Closing the Gap. This recommendation comes after assessing the performance of all four proposed options on jurisdictional data.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

CIPR Commissioned Report

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until